Author’s note: This article contains examples of victim blaming, Islamophobia, white supremacy, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia and references to pregnancy, rape and suicide.
You might think this is a call for journalists to illuminate the corruption of political elites or the exploitation of workers by the rich. Wrong. According to Milo Yiannopoulos, “powerful minorities” refer to trans-women, immigrants to the United States and social justice activists in general. Thanks to our campus chapters of College Republicans and Young Americans for Liberty, Yiannopoulos is coming to Emory to spread his hateful, violent ideology and promote his personal brand while discussing the recent Trump chalkings, “political correctness, feminism and other ‘hot’ topics.”
Yiannopoulos has an odd knack for inverting reality, saying, for example, that online feminists complaining about receiving death threats are “playing the victim:” that if they “use” these threats to garner sympathy or to seek legal action against those who threaten them, they’re “even more pathetic” than the people sending them death threats.
This is a typical narrative for Yiannopoulos. Those seeking to change the system that oppresses them are powerful bullies, while those in well-cemented positions of dominance in the community are powerless victims; any negative experience faced by an oppressed person, whether it’s a microaggression or a death threat, is just that person being over-sensitive. In contrast, activists bringing up heterosexual, cisgendered white men’s privilege is an attack against from which these men need to be defended. To respond to the perceived attacks on white men, Yiannopoulos has started a scholarship fund for them in an attempt to “put them on equal footing with their female, queer and ethnic minority classmates.”
To claim that white men need to be given assistance to put them on the same level as other groups is to deny completely the reality of oppression in order to defend the status quo. This is an attempt to undermine any potential for positive social change and to encourage people to defend the world as it is. By denying the existence of oppression, Yiannopoulos is able to defend the current organization of society, which is built on gendered and racial oppression, without coming across transparently as a white supremacist or bigot. While society views this position as more respectable than explicit prejudice, the results of this ideology are largely the same as those of explicit white supremacy and patriarchy.
But Yiannopoulos is not worried about avoiding explicit oppression and hate speech either. Regurgitating standard right-wing myths, he argues that gay people, and people in general, should oppose Muslim immigration to Europe and the U.S., which he argues will lead to Sharia law, an increase in rape and an increase in anti-gay violence. Additionally, he has dubbed his birthday “World Patriarchy Day” and encourages his followers to harass women in order to mock the concept of patriarchy, suggesting that they “cat-call at least five women” and “impregnate something.”
This is open misogyny, and Yiannopoulos doesn’t feel the need to hide it or deny that it happens — he’s promoting it — all he does is say it doesn’t matter, that he doesn’t care, that the harassment of women is perfectly fine with him.
This is hate speech. Inciting violence against women and treating them as deserving of harassment is hateful. There is nothing noble about not caring about the suffering of others or harming people for the sake of “pushing boundaries.” It’s selfish and apathetic.
Similarly, he encourages people to use gay, queer and f*ggot as insults, claiming that they’re great insults and that, as a gay man, his voice and experiences are representative of — or indeed, overshadow — those of millions of other queer people. This is also hate speech. Despite Yiannopoulos’ status as a gay man, he is actively promoting hatred against gay people, and he is promoting the idea that there are two types of homosexuals: f*ggots who should be hated and people like himself who should be accepted and praised because they support the status quo. He specifically mentions using these terms to distance himself from other gay men, again suggesting that his primary motivation is selfish: he’s content with gay people being treated horribly as long as his approval of discrimination gains him social capital and renders him, at least mostly, immune to the consequences of homophobia.
This theme continues when he discusses trans people. He argues that gay, lesbian and bisexual people should “drop the ‘T’ from LGBT” since trans people are too radical, are demanding too much politically and generally aren’t “respectable.” He wants those who have the privilege to assimilate to leave behind those who do not.
Additionally, he actively attacks trans people, arguing that society should respond to tragically high rates of trans suicide by ceasing to fund medical transitions through health insurance. In the same article, he consistently refers to trans-women using slurs, cites a study of trans-women being forced into prostitution as evidence that they’re more likely to be “criminals,” claims they’re really just gay men and claims that transphobia is “fueled mostly by theatrics from the uptight trans lobby.”
To be clear, trans people have been erased and marginalized within the LGBT community and activism for a long time. Attempting to leave behind trans people is nothing new. It is, however, part of the transantagonistic world we live in where 41 percent of trans people in the United States have attempted suicide. Trans-women, especially trans-women of color, are living in a state of emergency — trans-women make up 72 percent of all anti-LGBTQ and HIV-affected homicides and trans-women of color make up 67 percent. The only appropriate response to these tragic realities is to support tangibly trans people, especially trans-women of color, and work to dismantle the systems of oppression that devalue and promote violence against trans people.
But, to Yiannopoulos, trans folks are just another “powerful minority” bullying people to make themselves feel special.
Yiannopoulos is a sexist, racist, Islamophobic, transantagonistic, ableist, transmisogynistic, reactionary bigot whose main “strength” is his ability to deny other people’s suffering and whose main activity is mocking those who are working to make the world better.
For these reasons, I am writing to condemn publicly and explicitly Emory College Republicans and Emory Young Americans for Liberty’s decision to bring Yiannopoulos to campus to speak. He is toxic. By giving him a platform, they are making themselves an active part of the problem.
Stop enabling and inciting hatred.
And before anyone goes there, this is not about free speech. This is not me requesting any action from the administration — though I will say this is an excellent example of how Emory fails to be the “community of care” it advertises itself as. I’m much more concerned, at present, with morality than with policy — and supporting Yiannopoulos’ hatred is morally deplorable.
We don’t need a celebrity whose career is based on a toxic ideology that valorizes apathy, mocks the oppressed and denies the reality of their oppression in the name of pushing boundaries. We need to get serious about the fact that we have a moral obligation to care about each other, and this demands that we dismantle the systems of oppression that are harming people. We need to reject supremacy, selfishness and apathy. We need to continue the hard work of moving from empty rhetoric and bold dreams to a reality of liberation, towards a world where our value, our rights and our safety are not precariously dependent on us being white, documented and performing the genders assigned to us according to coercive societal norms. Our value should not be dependent on our ability to produce profit for those in power or being convenient to their political interests. And we need to continue to imagine what that would look like at Emory as we work to make it happen.
There’s a path forward. There’s a future worth being excited about. Milo Yiannopoulos isn’t part of it.
Anaïs Hussung is a College junior from Jackson City, Tennessee.
Regardless, it’s best to allow students to exercise their freedom to listen and the speaker’s freedom to speak and let students decide for themselves what they think.
Silencing speech is a slippery slope, for one day it could be used on speakers you agree with as well. It’s therefore best to combat speech you don’t like with even more speech. Perhaps instead of aggressive protests aimed at silencing the speaker, students should focus on bringing in a speaker who can counter this speaker’s arguments.
Besides, how is one to know who the idiot/bigot/whatever is if he or she isn’t allowed to speak?
but but my feels
“Regurgitating standard right-wing myths, he argues that gay people, and people in general, should oppose Muslim immigration to Europe and the U.S., which he argues will lead to Sharia law, an increase in rape and an increase in anti-gay violence. ”
Funny this was written the same day as this major news story. Myth?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/11/europe/britain-muslims-survey/index.html
52% of British Muslims in poll think homosexuality should be illegal
London (CNN ) More than half of British Muslims (52%) think homosexuality should not be legal, and nearly half (47%) think it is not appropriate for gay people to teach in schools, according to a new survey of British Muslims.
The results have sparked debate about the integration of the Britain’s largest religious minority.
The findings come from face-to-face interviews with 1,081 British Muslims by the polling agency ICM for a television program, “What British Muslims Really Think.” The program is scheduled to air Wednesday on Britain’s Channel 4.
“But but but Ithlam ith a religion of peaceth!” the effeminate SJW lisped
And the same effeminate SJWs would be thrown off a roof in Islamic countries.
Shorter version: hate speech is anything Anaïs Hussung disagrees with.
Hate? Where? Seriously. Has ANYONE that has written anything critical of Milo actually listened to his lectures?
The last time I read an article like this, the author suggested Milo promoted something (rape culture) he actively says doesn’t exist. Now is that responsible and informed reporting? I don’t think so.
One must wonder if he’s been branded hateful because it’s the easy thing to do, because I honestly can’t see it. I’d really love someone to point out where in any of his lectures he has preached any sort of hatred toward anything other than erroneous, toxic worldviews.
“Hate? Where?”
Within themselves. It’s more blaming other people for their lack of self control
Yes! Milo is coming!!!! Time to put these SJWs in their place.
1 word. TRIGGERED!
Jonathan Hussung, YOU’RE A WHITE MALE!
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
BUILD A WALL!
http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3496/2411/original.jpg?w=600&h
QUICKLY! STOP THAT MAN FROM TALKING!
HE MIGHT SAY SOMETHING WE DISAGREE WITH, AND WE WON’T HAVE ANY ACTUAL EVIDENCE TO DESPROVE HIM!
How is hate speech bad? Hate speech encourages debate and desensitizes people. It should be mandatory.
You managed to say a whole lot without actually saying anything of value
The only hate I see is yours.
The one who seems to be “inverting reality” is the author of this article.
How much social justice Kool-aid do you have to drink before you believe the syllables coming out of your jaw?
He hasn’t even spoken yet.
When islamic countries abolish apostate laws, blasphemy laws & Saudi Arabia allow 2 build churches in their country I will stop be islamophobic.
BTW islam is deadly, parasitic, theocratic, totalitarian cult not religion.
Islamic migrants NOT welcome in Europe
Typical college kid these days with an undeveloped sense of humor and no tolerance for dissentious opinions. I don’t agree with half of what Milo says, but he’s intelligent, funny and is a challenging speaker. Maybe *you* should challenge him with your own ideas on the subjects you listed, rather than throwing labels around and trying to silence him. Back when I was in school, we called that “debate”.
This! I agree 100%.
What, your last name is Hussung? Check your privilege you evil, white shitlord.
Oh do we get to “publicly condemn” people here? I want to publicly condemn the writer for not understanding how TOTALLY AWESOME Milo truly is. Oh, and trans is a form of mental illness.
“victim blaming, Islamophobia, white supremacy, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia…” The author was really swinging for the fences with this one. With all those buzzwords, surely that’s SJW Bingo.
Liberalism truly is moral Syphilis.
MAGA.
Lets be real folks; the feminist experiment has been a total failure.
Feminist movement bankrupt morally when they refuse 2 take stand after more then 1000 women were harassed sexually in Cologne Germany, in new year eve.
Milo is a degenerate homosexual and should be banned from campus on that basis.
that’s antisemitic
Funny how all this shaming language and pseudo-intellectual quackery smacks of old soviet re-education gimicks designed to undermine a population:
“Everything of the past which could offer any kind of refuge was to be muddied and denigrated. This included the heroes of history and the folklore of Christian inspiration. Then, to be given
special attention, was the destruction of love for family, in order completely to isolate the victim in his own misery, bereft of religion, love of country, and family. This would break the chain that links together a community of national thought and gives meaning to a national struggle. When the individual was thus cut off from his history, faith and family, the ultimate step in “re-educating” him was to destroy his existence as a personality — an individual. This, to the victim, was to prove the most painful step of all and was called his “unmasking. ”
https://archive.org/stream/TheAnti-humans/AntiHumans_djvu.txt
I got AIDS reading this article
Ban Milo or others might get AIDS too.
You are contributing to further social stigmatization of AIDS. AIDS is not the result of bad lifestyle choices but something that just happens. In fact its not even that bad. Most people who die of AIDS are actually dying of bigotry.
now that I’m dying of article AIDS, how can I mitigate my bigotry to survive? HOW?!
Why are women allowed to vote? I can’t think of one good reason. It’s almost as absurd as non-white’s voting.
That Cultural Marxist jibba-jabba is played out.
The real reason they hate Milo is because he is a Jew and Jews did 9/11. Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams.
” sexist, racist, Islamophobic, transantagonistic, ableist, transmisogynistic, reactionary bigot”
You guys are a self-parody and completely incapable of sustaining the civilization bequeathed to you by your betters. Please kill yourself.
increasing muslim migration to the west will increase peace, harmony, unicorn sightings, the degree to which gays can sodomise each other in public and many other hallmarks of western civilisation 10-fold!
It’s not too late, Hussung. You’re still young. You have your whole life ahead of you. You’ve just been lied to by useful idiots is all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZnkULuWFDg
Stalin. Biggest Murderer In History.
Is Hussung a ching-chong name?
German.
As a gay man, I believe Milo outranks you in the privilege wars, Hussung. Better check it.
Renounce the Poz.
What 2 expect from ppl who worship communist criminal murderer homophobe & racist (yes he killed many black ppl in Congo) Che Guevara
Your glorious future doesn’t even have a place for you. It doesn’t have a place for any one because it is completely against human nature and civilization. Perhaps it includes the barbarian mud races but they don’t fit into civilization anyways.
Milo did nothing wrong. (You know, except for that whole being a pillow-biter thing)
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/06/01/theres-no-gender-pay-gap-but-here-are-11-reasons-why-there-should-be/
It must be nice to brand something you disagree with as “hate” and use the slur to silence people who disagree with your utopian nonsense.
The left throws around the word hate to justify denying freedom of speech to opinions they don’t like. They are your basic authoritarian lunatics.
Hate is the new cool
It’s one of those words the left has rendered meaningless and pliable. It means whatever they want it to mean at any given time for whatever political purpose they wish to use it for.
Did it ever occur to you that Milo opposes Islamification because he doesn’t want to be lashed, imprisoned, or beheaded for being homosexual? Even our allies the Saudis do that. Gay rights and Islamic immigration go together like peanut butter and fish.
Words NEVER spoken by any woman, anywhere in the history of the world:
“Islam is freedom”
” If, however, we understand free speech in a way that is actually about defending the views of the oppressed, pushing our campus to seek greater justice and moving towards being an inclusive community that cared for all of its members, then I support free speech completely.”
Hey Hussung, how come you support free speech for BLM but not for Milo, a conservative gay man? You flip-flop on issues like Hillary.
Because using the word hate is a ploy. It’s a slur and that is all it is.
The word hate is just the religious lefts way of screaming SINNER or HERETIC. It doesn’t have any real meaning.
Very true. The same goes for the words racist, sexist, and all the many phobias.
Milo you glorious f-gg-t you’ve done it again.
BTW so called transgenderism did not exist until 60s of past century when it was created by the left as another tool w destroy society.
BTW I demand LBGT pride parade in Mecca & Teheran (((-:
That would be the only gay cause I would donate money too.
No, they created it to end discrimination!
I think a quote from Jefferson is appropriate here: “If there be any among us who would wish to
dissolve this Union, or to change its republican form, let them stand
undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may
be tolerated, where reason is left free to combat it.”
SECEDE!!!!
The left abandoned any pretense of rationality long ago. Leftist operate on pure emotion.
Mizzhoax.
Whoa! Check your privilege there, shitlord! How dare you condemn Milo for how he chooses to present himself! This man has done more to put homosexuality in the mainstream than you ever will, and promotes the ideal that LGBT groups can have values and personalities that don’t revolve around their sexual orientation or gender identity. You claim to be a beacon of equality in the swampy world of oppression, but all I see is somebody who hates and publicly shames a man because has different beliefs than you do. You should be ashamed of yourself! If you’re the type of person who would encourage your readers to hate somebody just because you don’t share their views – YOU are part of the problem!
Anais Hussung
???
After finishing this article.
Trigger warning this vid contain so called “islamophobia” (-:
In 1683 Polish wing hussars (polish heavy cavalry) saved West from islamic invaders near Vienna now its time 2 do it again
https://youtu.be/cjdvf01pJXg
This looks great, what movie is this?
The Day of the Siege: September Eleven 1683
https://youtu.be/EzkZ0YvUoTE
Anais Hussung (lol) is a virulent anti-semite. Denying the Jewish Milo his right to speech is dangerously close to loading him into a cattle car bound for the work camps. Hussung is also a possible racist. As an Arab? (or some sort of mystery meat) he is lower on the hierarchy of victimhood than Africans. As Milo expresses an exclusive preference for black men, the author’s dismissal of Milo is very problematic.
Also, we all know that anyone who criticizes gays is secretly gay themselves.
Stop triggering me, bro.
Hussung is white. I believe his surname has German origins. He’s also some sort of non-binary. As for Milo, I don’t believe he’s Jewish. In the video of the event, Milo is wearing a cross on a chain around his neck.
I still dont fully understand what is going on in US but I’m 100% certain that Europe must defend itself not only from islam, but also such delusional & toxic ideas like safe spaces, trigger warnings etc. that are coming from America.
What is happeing 2 you once great nation? You kick a$$ everybody who dare 2 challenge You, send ppl 2 the Moon & now THIS. (LOL)
This and TV
One more double think from my backyard.
democracy is ppl right 2 choose govt – facism is coming ppl choose conservatives
We are totally anti establishment – Soros money are perfectly OK
feminism and the 1960’s.
I wish people would quit telling these pretentious children that their feelings matter.
Exactly.
Anaïs Hussung and her ilk are the same whiny-babies who were crying over spilled chalk.
Useless carbuncles on society they are.
How much time you “activists” need 2 realize that you are being played & manipulated by upper class old white men like George Soros & Noam Chomsky
(((white men)))
The universities need to be scrapped.
The average gender studies student…
You people are destroying the US academic world. The rest of the world laughs. It will not happen over night, but it will happen.
Already happened. It’s too late.
And never forget the right-wing watched them destroy academia and never lifted a finger to prevent it. This is the lesson we all must learn.
“You could’ve prevented this…”
Oh screw off. Who wants to operate in such a hostile environment? It’s like trying to sprint up an escalator while someone is throwing knives at you.
The right gave away the store. Dropped off the key and walked away.
The inspirational illegals are unamused by Milo…
What every university student needs to hear…
Omg I Had to change wastebaskets after literally puking my brains out after reading this garbage. Every paragraph just show more and more of the pathetic, spineless, man hating, victim culture that the regressive left is known for these days. I’m sorry precious snowflakes but the real world is full of harsh truths, and not everyone cares about your feelings, it’s time to wake up and grow a backbone, or warm up the bath, and pull out your sharpest razor blades and end it quickly. Social justice warriors are not meant to live in the real world.
I’m not a fan of the term ‘regressive left”. This isn’t some variant strain of leftism. This is leftism minus the lip service and window dressing. The left have enough power to reveal itself for what it is. Nothing the left is doing now is original. This is what the left has done every time it’s come to power. From the Bolsheviks to the 60’s radicals. It’s who they are. The term also implies that there exists a legitimate progressive left. There isn’t.
I giggled a little when I read this. Take a look at Jonathan Haidt’s bookie for a breakdown of the moral schema.
Yeah, but it’s still lulzy to tell SJWs to kill themselves. Razors aren’t enough though. They should take a lesson from Vietnamese Buddhists.
This is absolutely a variant strain of leftism. If you don’t realize that, you haven’t looked into the movement very deeply. It’s philosophical grandparents, its language, its methodologies and the figures and causes it typically supports. It is VERY LEFT WING. And not only that, it is very marxist in its particular flavor.
Oy vey the Jewish people will not be censored.
Lots of oy veying here, goyim
We have a future clickbait journalist in the making
https://www.youtube.com/embed/RrkzIN2eP0U
LOL. Anaïs Hussung = complete moron.
My God.
Emory writers have completely gone off the deep end.
I wouldn’t send my dog to that crappy university.
Anaïs Hussung, YOU are a vapid waste of space.
This is why I didn’t even bother writing for the Wheel. It’s become Salon.com at Emory.
Indeed it has…..
What kind of jobs are open to crybullies?
The kind that needs them to say “…you want fries with that?”
Given that some students went into a panic because someone chalked support for a controversial presidential candidate, I think Emory could use some exposure to ideas other than their usual diet of left-wing boiler plate. Open a window and let a little of the real world in, even if some of it may be objectionable.
As an alum, I am absolutely floored by the racism inherent in this article.
Yes, Whites ARE on the same level as other groups.
They’re the majority of the population and the numeric majority of those in poverty, yet are ignored completely and often excluded when it comes to welfare programs and collegiate aid.
What’s worse, “affirmative action” programs cause these impoverished whites to be discriminated against when it comes to hiring.
The “reality of oppression” is leftists pushing a double standard of racial identity politics for everyone who isn’t white while calling white identity politics racist.
Either all identity politics are racist, none are, or the person with the double standard is racist.
“We need to continue the hard work of moving from empty rhetoric and bold dreams to a reality of liberation, towards a world where our value, our rights and our safety are not precariously dependent on us being white, documented and performing the genders assigned to us according to coercive societal norms.”
What “work” is that, Anais? Preventing people from speaking? What exactly did you have in mind besides this churlish rant of yours?
Please, instead of printing angry demagoguery, why enlighten us all with your great wisdom and insight into this matter.
“And before anyone goes there, this is not about free speech. This is not me requesting any action from the administration — though I will say this is an excellent example of how Emory fails to be the “community of care” ”
I am not for censorship but why is there no censorship?????????
Someone wants university turned into a daycare centre…
He is a legend though. Well spoken, deals with facts, and an all roound smart person. His political choices don’t change that.
“And before anyone goes there, this is not about free speech.”
Of course it is. There are two kinds of people: free speech absolutists—embodied by Milo—and your kind.
You claim that he spreads a “violent ideology” by SPEAKING and that you spread a peaceful one by calling for the suppression or disdain of his speech on any level? Look around and see how few you’ve convinced.
Yeah. Get used to losing.
First off, thank you for the Author’s note about potential triggers! Words are so scary!
You say Milo brings hate…Is that like the Chalking that said “F**ck MILO!”
That kind of hate?
Remember what your mother taught you, “Sticks and stones….”
Grow up, Snowflake
Vote Trump or Cruz
Vote Trump or Cruz
I hope your fee-fees weren’t overly hurt by this terrible white man’s opinions, you sexist, racist simpleton.
In contrast, activists bringing up heterosexual, cisgendered white men’s privilege is an attack against from which these men need to be defended. To respond to the perceived attacks on white men…”
“Yiannopoulos is a sexist, racist… whose main “strength” is his ability to deny other people’s suffering…”
Sounds like he’s not the only one. You can’t even bring yourself to acknowledge that the group he champions could actually feel under attack, let alone actually be under attack. Perhaps that’s why he’s so popular. These groups are taking validation from and discussing their concerns with the only people that will listen to them and provide insight.
You automatically lump the group into three categories, especially using the term “cisgender”.
Cisgender is the “N” word for heteros, and you do not have a right to label them, nor define them through that label. Whatever the original intention of this term was, it has failed and it needs to go away.
I do applaud your call for individuals to choose whether to attend or not, and not an outright ban on him speaking. In particular, Universities are especially supposed to be a forum for unpopular ideas and language to surface and be addressed in the light of day. It is a place to either convert others to what we think is the ethical and moral position, or to learn how to combat their ideas on-campus and beyond.
We clearly don’t agree on several things, but I think our rules of engagement are fairly similar. Take care.
This is a pathetic, pathetic article. Your only real argument is that Milo hurts people’s feelings.
You guys need to respect the views of others and shouldn’t misrepresent them as sexist/ racist when they simply don’t align with your own. How is college btw im sure many different views are represented there and aloud to be debated without the fear of being painted racist, or bigoted right? It’s totally a free exchange of ideas right? Do you understand what nuance comedy and satire are? I would love to check in with this author in 5 years after he has had some time to experience reality. You sir are brainwashed!
Greetings from Norway.
I believe you students really should work harder to get in more diverse debates. Ok. So Milo is ekstreme in his dialogue. And he also has some wiews that is ekstreme. But you students. Especially you that are against his views. Have so mutch to learn about the diversity of debate, point of view and others ways of approaching a problem.
Sadly i see this same issue here in my country. As an result, just as milo tries to point out, the media and all of the mecanics around it that should inform, is getting corrupted and bias.
It is you young students that will shape the future. Actively awoiding difficult views and issues is a definite end of the society you love so mutch. And that is something you students can not afford.
And to you dear writer. You should start checking who you are writing about. Especially what he has said during the past 2 years. If you really one day want to ex get a nobel price this kind of reporting will definently make sure you will never reach that goal.
Trump 2016, you worthless wussy.